Follow us on Google News

Get the latest updates directly in your Google News feed

The Museum of Modern Art, according to author Neil Gaiman, failed to properly recognise aDC Comicsartist in their description of a painting by Roy Lichtenstein.

DC

The MoMA’s description mentions the Drowning Girl comic that inspired Lichtenstein’s picture but fails to recognise the original artist, Tony Abruzzo, as Gaiman pointed out in a tweet directed at the museum.

Crediting the publisher and not the artist contributes to the fiction that these comics were created by companies and not by people, and that nobody drew the original images.

Amazing Spider-Man 2’s Final Line Sets Up No Way Home’s Retcon Perfectly

— Neil Gaiman (@neilhimself)June 24, 2025

Drowning Girl’s description has not been updated or reacted to by the MoMA.

Timeless: The One Villain Thanos Can’t Touch Is Kang’s True Nemesis

Tony Abruzzo

The source for the 1963 oil painting Drowning Girl was“Run for Love!”a story from DC Comics’Secret Love #83,which was published in 1962, according to the MoMA’s description. In the 1950s and 1960s, Abruzzo primarily worked on romantic comic books for National Periodicals/DC Comics. The original page depicted the titular Drowning Girl in the middle of the ocean, with her boyfriend clinging to a capsized boat in the backdrop.

Along with Andy Warhol and Jasper Johns, Lichtenstein was an American pop artist who had a key role in the 1960s new art movement. Lichtenstein reworked Abruzzo’s initial illustration by removing the background characters and tracing Abruzzo’s original drowning girl before changing the composition to his liking. He subsequently transferred the sketch to a canvas, which became one of his most well-known works.

Scream 2022 Ending Explained

This Isn’t The First Time Credit Has Been Given To A Comic Publisher And Not Original Artist

This isn’t the first time a museum has given credit to a comic book publisher rather than the original creator. Whaam!, a Lichtenstein artwork that was taken from artist Irv Novick’s panel in the 1962DC ComicAll American Men of War, had a similar incidence. Whaam! was on show at the Tate Modern in London, however, Novick’s name was omitted from the painting’s description.

Source-Twitter,The Museum of Modern Art

Prachee Mishra

Articles Published :111

More from Prachee Mishra

Amazing Spider-Man 2’s Final Line Sets Up No Way Home’s Retcon Perfectly

Timeless: The One Villain Thanos Can’t Touch Is Kang’s True Nemesis

Scream 2022 Ending Explained

‘Bachelor in Paradise’ Season 10 Episode 9: Release Date and What to Expect

NYT Strands August 05, 2025 Hints and Solution

You Can Finally Watch Brad Pitt’s ‘F1’ Blockbuster at Home: Digital Release Date Revealed - Report

NYT Pips Solution for July 09, 2025

‘Game of Thrones’ Cast Ranked by Net Worth: Who’s the Richest GOT Actor?

Every Makoto Shinkai Main Character Ranked From Worst to Best

All American Men of WarArtistcomicsDCDrowning GirlIrv NovickMoMAneil gaimanRoy LichtensteinTony AbruzzoWhaam!

Article image